The two short stories “My Heart is Broken”
and “Prue” obviously deal with female protagonists and the events surrounding
them. Therefore, these stories can be interpreted through feminist literary
analysis, which focuses on how women are represented in literature in relation
to a patriarchal society. Despite their similarities, “My Heart is Broken” and “Prue”
have some differences when viewed from a feminist perspective. While “My Heart
is Broken” portrays a rather passive female protagonist, “Prue” illustrates a
more active and stereotype-breaking protagonist.
One interesting point of comparison between
these stories is looking at how patriarchal society is represented in each
story. In “My Heart is Broken,” Mrs. Thompson mirrors the male-dominated
society. Mrs. Thompson claims that Jeannie got raped because she “took a walk
in the bush that way” and “had them all on the boil.” Her attitude resembles
that of a patriarchal society, which blames the victim for rape. Moreover, Mrs.
Thompson reinforces traditional feminine values, including cleaning up the home
and being happy with a caring husband. Mrs. Thompson tells Jeannie that “you
could have cleaned up your home a bit” and questions Jeannie for not being
happy with “a good, sensible husband working for you.” Through Mrs. Thompson,
the patriarchal society is manifest from the beginning to the end of the story.
However, in “Prue,” the male-dominated society only appears in a single
paragraph where Prue, the female protagonist, complains about her name. Prue,
or Prudence, reflects the traditional value that a woman should be always
prudent about her actions. The story is more centered on Prue as a person
rather on the male-dominant society that Prue is subject to.
The two female protagonists respond
differently to the stereotypes of a patriarchal society. Jeannie in “My Heart
is Broken” occasionally defends herself from Mrs. Thompson’s accusations, but
she does not claim that Mrs. Thompson’s views are totally wrong. For the most
time, Jeannie remains passive towards Mrs. Thompson, although she voices her
own opinion at the very end. On the other hand, Prue explicitly rejects the
stereotypes of a male-dominated society. She does not complain about most
things but readily complains about her name, a symbol of gender stereotype.
Prue also calls her marriage a “cosmic disaster” and “regards sex as a
wholesome, slightly silly indulgence.” She does not even seem to take gender
stereotypes seriously. From the male-centered view, Prue is not prudent at all.
The two protagonists also differ in where
they find satisfaction. Jeannie reveals that “If he’d liked me, I wouldn’t have
minded,” which means that Jeannie would have been satisfied if the rapist had
liked her. Her words are surprising from the traditional view, as shown from
Mrs. Thompson’s attitude. Traditionally, raped women feel shameful at the fact
that they are raped. However, Jeannie does not care about her virginity or
shame, but focuses on the relationship between her and the rapist. But Jeannie’s
view is still passive because her heart is “broken” by a man. Her very
statement that her heart is broken, though not identical to the patriarchal
view, proves that she depends on men’s love to be satisfied.
On the other hand, Prue finds satisfaction
from her own actions. Prue’s independence from men is evident when Prue regards
Gordon’s marriage proposal as “reasonable.” Gordon states that he has another
lover but wants to marry Prue in a few years. If Gordon had said this to
Jeannie, Jeannie would have been unsatisfied because Gordon does not love her. Prue’s
attitude towards Gordon’s proposal shows that Prue’s satisfaction does not rely
on Gordon’s love. Furthermore, Prue is satisfied from her own actions because
she “steals” Gordon’s possessions. She is satisfied not because she is “struck”
by Gordon’s memory from the stolen objects, but because she “takes” and then “forgets”
his possessions. Prue obviously plays an active role; she acquires satisfaction
for herself.
To conclude, the two protagonists are
different because one is passive and the other is active. Jeannie, the passive
protagonist, reacts to Mrs. Thompson in a passive manner and depends upon men
for satisfaction. Contrary to Jeannie, Prue defies traditional stereotypes and
constructs her own satisfaction. While Jeannie is “feminine,” Prue is “female.”
Nice structure and thesis. I find it interesting that you describe Prue as active, when post the class pointed out her passivity regarding Gordon's affairs. She's active in some ways, but very passive in others. I do think we could call her "independent," but active might be a bit strong and very case by case. I think she illustrates a different approach to "love" that is not passionate, and merely based on companionship later in life. Gordon is honest and probably feels she is someone he wants when he's older and tired of young volatile women.
답글삭제Jeannie is simply a bit of a simpleton in my opinion. An intelligent protagonist? I am not sure Gallant wanted one for this story. Prue, on the other hand, does reflect some wisdom and intelligence.
Good work!