As the title Tales of the Unexpected suggests, the short stories inside this
book contain a variety of turning points. Sometimes the turning points provide
a plausible explanation to a seemingly mysterious chain of events, as in “Taste”
and “Skin.” In other stories, the turning points expose the hidden part of the
individual, as in “Man from the South,” when it is revealed that the woman
engaged in multiple bets. Among these turning points, those which provide an
understandable explanation to mysterious, even bizarre events, effectively
portray the human nature of deception: humans often deceive others because they
do not want real risk.
In the story “Taste,” a connoisseur called
Richard Pratt participates in a seemingly absurd bet. Based on his numerous
experiences on tasting and evaluating food and drink, he strongly insists that
he can figure out the name of the wine served at a dinner. He proposes a
bizarre bet: if he exactly figures out the name of the wine, he would marry the
daughter of the dinner host. The dinner host, Mike Schofield, says that this
bet is absurd, but reluctantly participates in the bet. Although Pratt pretends
to concentrate in figuring out its name, in the end of the story it is revealed
that Pratt already saw the name of the wine. Moreover, in the story “Skin,”
Drioli has a tattoo on his back drawn by a famous artist, Soutine. Because the tattoo
is an early work of a well-known artist, many people wants to have it, and a
man states that he would give Drioli immense wealth and pleasure if Drioli
gives him the picture. However, the man was actually incapable of giving Drioli
the promised gift. The two stories have similar endings which remarkably reveal
the deception of characters.
Such deception enables the characters to
participate in a safe bet, which ensures that they would get what they want. As
a result, the characters have a strong motivation to engage in deception. This
ending shows that humans deceive others for the sake of their safe, 100% sure
advantage. Moreover, the placement of the “revelation” of deception reflects another
characteristic of human deception. The revelation is always placed at the end
of the story, which provides an unexpected turning point. Such placement could
be done for the sake of providing a twist, but this very placement exactly
reflects deception in real life. Every liar hopes that his deception would not
be disclosed forever because the liar worries that he would be in trouble when
his lie is exposed. Even though the deception is revealed, it is always revealed
in the end. Therefore, the “unexpected” twist in the end of the story resembles
the predictable pattern of disclosing a real-life deception, and further
reveals the desire for safety behind deception.
When a person deceives others, he is hiding
two things: the reality and the fact that he is lying. The characters of “Taste”
and “Skin” lies, respectively, that he has an extraordinary ability to figure
out the name of a wine and he can provide wealth and comfort in compensation of
a skin tattoo. These characters conceal the reality, that he has no ability to magically figure out the name of any wine and that he has no ability to provide wealth and pleasure, to certainly gain what they desire. Moreover, they hide the fact that they lie, a behavior represented in the placement of the revelation of deception, because they want to be safe from the troubles associated with their lies being exposed. Therefore, through his deceptive characters, Roald Dahl shows that deception is a result of the desire for safety.
test
답글삭제Damn it. I typed a long response here about The Landlady, asking you to consider the nature of deception in this instance, but when I pressed enter it got lost.
답글삭제Anyways, well written and unique path. No body else in class identified deception in this way, and most people focus on revenge and risk taking.
Good stuff.